supernaturals #2 - featuring penny flame - is a total entertainment value. every segment is well composed, well photographed, full of excited participants, and one of the better videos to come along. finding the delicate midpoint between 'checklist' (boh-rinng!) and 'free-for-all' (excuse me - the camera is over here!) plus you get the "brother love 'pick a perversion" menu in the dvd extras section that strings all the 'bj' or 'cowgirl' (or whatever) segments together into one long scene. many thanks to this site for their excellent choice in this title. mark twain said, "there's no accounting for human taste" - but this one is awfully tasty - no matter what.

well - that's what mark twain said. here's another one of those videos that where the camera-person has decided the best shot and angle is tight-shot, full-on, genitals and inner thighs as seen from between the knees. this is not a bad shot - if it were one of several vantage points - but the guy just gets parked there and all you see of the girl are her nostrils sticking up over her mons. again - the question that begs an answer is, "why bother to get cute, trim, models when you never actually see them?" if all that's interesting is the genitals and anus, why not just go to a dairy-farm and shoot cows? i'm not sure anyone could tell the difference. with a wide, full-torso image, it would seem the viewer could simply direct their eyes to the point of their interest - wherever that may be. but noooooo... with these guys all you get it's wall-to-wall cinerama butt-cam.

This series seems to have tapped into the fact that women from Europe are, in fact, 'Fuckin' Beautiful'. Aside from my perpetual annonyance and complaint with the fact that the camera people seem obsessed with choosing a camera angle that manages to obscure most of the otherwise georgeous women's bodies, this is a well-done effort that lives up to the hype in the title.

Gosh DARN it! With talent like Wendy James - they sent in a videographer who - throughout the entire piece - had the incredible knack of pointing the camera with exacly the least interesting purview. This is not a dud - but the overall production shows the typical phenomena where the appeal of the talent far exceeds the ability of the people making the film to simply let them look at good as they already are.

...they aren't kidding. IF you like 'amateur' - and we're talking RANK amateur - then you'll love this series of four girls doing female solo. The camera-person is very kind to them in terms of being pushy and the girls are so obviously not used to 'selling it' to the camera - the result could be called 'tame' - but, if anything, it's authentic. Not exactly the most erotic - but certainly worth a look as a study in people pushing their own erotic boundaries.

The girls in FRONT of the camera pretty much qualify as Amateurs - they're pretty and the routine, as directed, is the same for each of the segments. Some of them may have not known what they were showing up to be in - as there's some apparent reluctance to 'complete' the performance on the part of some of the girls - others are quite happy to give it a good go. There's no problem at all with the (pleasantly) tame performances - but, once again, the photographer in BACK of the camera who seems determined to get that 'between the knees' angle - and hold it - where all you see of the girls are a couple of nostrils. This may just a be a complaint of mine - but why go to all the trouble of hiring pretty girls with nice bodies if all you see are huge panoramas of inner thighs and genitals? What is going on in the camera-person's mind? You could see ALL of that stuff AND the REST of the person if you just raised the lens about 1 foot. It remains a mystery why SO MUCH of the focus is locked into that low perspective. Because of this, so much of the girls, their reactions, and other body language is completely lost. Not to be negative - overall it's nicely done.

rodney moore normally provides very well done material that has lots of hot mooments. this set of 5 scenes has absolutely no sexual content - solo or duo. the alleged atttraction is that these ladies - all reasonably attractive - have simply not shaved anywhere in the last five years or so. if just looking at hair on a woman's body is your thing - mebbe this ain't so bad. from this chair, the view is that the feature is an asexual expression focusing on a dubiously compelling fetish. this feature should not be confused with any of the 'horny hairy girls' titles from rodney moore - which is what happened to me. sadder but wiser - i'm happy that was a rental and not a purchase - as in, "you'll, laugh, you'll cry, you'll kiss $20 bucks goodbye!" oh well - to each his own - fro me, this one coughs up only one-hairball.

There are a couple of titles out there which deal with the 'Get More Pussy' angle. This one is actually doing what they purport. There's good info, humor, good sex - OK, REALLY good sex - and Penny Flame not only sports a great body, wild enthusiam for sex, but is a VERY funny, intelligent, insightful, 'host' for the production - can't say enough good things about Ms Flame.

if only it would dawn on the producers of these features the notion that, "there's nothing as exciting as an excited woman", their job would be so much easier for them and the resulting feature so much more enjoyable to look at. still, this is a better-than-average female-solo production - and whoever is creating these efforts is getting better at doing it - as this title is better than the previous pp features.

The girls who showed up for this production were far better than the people who ran the session and the cameras. How IS it that those guys can screw up something as 'soup and sandwich' as pretty girls doing sexy stuff? Well, there were a couple of good moments in there - and it's not a total loss - but a thumb-up to the girls and a thumb-down to the guys.