You can easily spot the decade of this film from the handly bar mustaches and the fact that a razor hadn't been invented yet. The movie started out with two men in a court scene that was drawn on posterboard and colored with crayons. THis is sort of important because the two lead men were on trial for being devients and you just heard to yokels commening throughout the movie ruining the few scenes that had any potential.
As for the scenes they seemed contrived with the women spoiting off rather dumb lines instead of the sounds in other movies. It took about twenty minutes from the start of the film to where anyone was seen without any clothing.
The menus were lacking, and there were no special features either.
In short my wife and I didn't really feel the need to watch the whole movie and got rather bored.
i can't even say how many ways this is a bad movie. the sex is lackluster, production values are nil, lighting, camera work, script, casting - all pathetic. the women are only tolerably attractive, the guys can't even get it up half the time, and when they do, the camera is in a spot where you can't see anything, or only from 20 feet away. the whole thing is framed and constantly interrupted by the "courtroom" characters, most of them played by the painfully unfunny harry reems, whose billing on this film is completely misleading, as he appears in no sex scenes whatsoever. more filler than i've ever seen in a porn film, and the parts that weren't filler weren't much better. it's not "so bad, it's good". it's just bad.
I love old school 70's magic, but this movie was bad. Bad scenes, bad plot, some weird blond with a star in her cleavage, just stupid bad. Very very very bad.