I liked wacthing these tight young girls get naked and do their thing. It was refreshing to see them going solo and enjoying it. I had an easier time imagining myself there without the guy in the picture. Thumbs up for this one.
The girls in FRONT of the camera pretty much qualify as Amateurs - they're pretty and the routine, as directed, is the same for each of the segments. Some of them may have not known what they were showing up to be in - as there's some apparent reluctance to 'complete' the performance on the part of some of the girls - others are quite happy to give it a good go.
There's no problem at all with the (pleasantly) tame performances - but, once again, the photographer in BACK of the camera who seems determined to get that 'between the knees' angle - and hold it - where all you see of the girls are a couple of nostrils. This may just a be a complaint of mine - but why go to all the trouble of hiring pretty girls with nice bodies if all you see are huge panoramas of inner thighs and genitals? What is going on in the camera-person's mind? You could see ALL of that stuff AND the REST of the person if you just raised the lens about 1 foot. It remains a mystery why SO MUCH of the focus is locked into that low perspective. Because of this, so much of the girls, their reactions, and other body language is completely lost.
Not to be negative - overall it's nicely done.
It is only the girls and pretty boring at that. They are simply sitting on a chair and not to elaborately showing themselves. We like more action than that.